As being the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by law." It is actually properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
In that sense, case legislation differs from just one jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in Ny would not be decided using case regulation from California. Instead, Ny courts will assess the issue relying on binding precedent . If no previous decisions to the issue exist, New York courts could possibly have a look at precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority rather than binding authority. Other factors which include how outdated the decision is as well as closeness to your facts will affect the authority of a specific case in common legislation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Therefore, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has got to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this sort of an appeal has not nevertheless been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner might then request further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Even though there is no prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds very little sway. Still, if there is no precedent inside the home state, relevant case regulation from another state may be regarded by the court.
During the United States, individuals here are not necessary to hire an attorney to represent them in both civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their very own can remember a single rule of thumb when it comes to referring to case legislation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as feasible, leading the court, not only towards the case, but to your section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
A lot of judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in placing the Petitioner's name about the ECL based around the criminal case are inconsistent with recognized legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed Read more
Only the written opinions on the Supreme Court as well as the Court of Appeals are routinely available. Decisions on the decreased (trial) courts are not generally published or distributed.
Are you currently looking for Court Information? You should utilize our site to search to get a case or search for just a person. Information around the site is updated every 24 several hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found within the search site is provided for use as reference material and isn't the official court record.
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair into the offender as well as Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe as a foster child. Although the couple had two youthful children of their individual at home, the social worker did not notify them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report on the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement while in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple experienced youthful children.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent as well as the case under appeal, Potentially overruling the previous case law by setting a completely new precedent of higher authority. This may possibly take place several times as the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of your High Court of Justice, later in the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his development from the concept of estoppel starting during the High Trees case.
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage is not really comprehensive, but this is an excellent starting point. See Background section at base of RECAP website for more information.